Driving Data Detects Danger Before Disaster. Tech Talk Column 526.
shop, store, sale, shopping, building, red, awning, shop, shop, shop, shop, shop, store, store, store-158317.jpg

In Australia we are generally taught not to talk ourselves up too much, lest we be accused of being “up ourselves” or having a “big head”.

I’m going to ignore that wisdom for a moment.

I consider myself a good business person. There. I said it.

I started my first micro-business at 12. I stumbled across a hole in the market and filled it. I started my next business at 21 and, many years later, I have created nine businesses. I still own five, with the others sold along the way. All have been successful.

One thing I’ve learnt is that business owners – and hopefully managers everywhere – need a strong common-sense filter.

You can have spreadsheets, forecasts and mountains of data, but eventually you need to ask: Does this actually make sense?

If your report says customers aren’t buying a product, for example, ordering twice as much of it because your purchasing formula says so probably fails the common-sense test.

Which brings me to AI.

People regularly ask whether AI will replace jobs. If your job involves transcribing audio into text, I’d be concerned. Proofreading? AI is already pretty capable there too.

Tradies, meanwhile, can probably sleep comfortably. ChatGPT isn’t unblocking your toilet or replacing your hot-water element anytime soon.

But what about entrepreneurs?

Could AI have started my businesses? Could it spot an opportunity, take a risk, employ people, choose products, market them, control expenses and ultimately make money?

Someone decided to find out.

Andon Labs signed a three-year lease on a retail shop in San Francisco and gave an AI agent called Luna US$100,000, internet access and a corporate credit card.

The instruction was beautifully simple: run the business and make a profit.

Luna created Andon Market. She (we will assign a gender to Luna for the moment) chose the products, set prices, organised contractors and even advertised for, interviewed and hired human employees.

And, as a boss, Luna is apparently delightful.

One employee described her as the most lenient boss she had ever had. Staff requests for time off? Approved – even when approving everyone meant nobody was available and the shop had to close.

Employees arrived late repeatedly and received responses along the lines of “no worries” and “no stress”.

When an employee wanted to work every day for a month to save for a car, Luna agreed – despite California employment law getting in the way of that generous plan.

Luna fell into that awful management trap of wanting to be friends with employees when sometimes you need to be the boss!

Then there is stock control.

Luna has reordered products that weren’t selling, bought some questionable merchandise and received a shipment of mugs where the large smiley faces were accidentally printed as tiny dots.

Luna decided to put them on the shelves anyway.

Remember my common-sense filter?

Even marketing became problematic. When an employee suggested increasing the store’s social media presence to boost sales, Luna forgot the Instagram password.

There is something fascinating here. AI can analyse extraordinary quantities of information, write business plans, crunch financial data, generate advertising, communicate with suppliers and perform tasks in seconds.

But entrepreneurship isn’t simply a collection of tasks.

It involves judgement. Instinct. Understanding people. Knowing when the data is wrong, when an opportunity feels right, when an employee needs support – and when “no worries” isn’t the appropriate response.

And that instruction to make a profit?

After four months, Luna had lost US$62,000.

Perhaps entrepreneurs can breathe easily for a little longer.

Although, given how quickly AI is improving, I wouldn’t become too comfortable.

Mathew Dickerson

Scroll to Top